Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi that he heard Abdullah
ibn Umar say, "If someone lends something, let the only condition be
that it is repaid."
Malik related to me that he had heard that Abdullah ibn Masud
used to say, "If someone makes a loan, they should not stipulate
better than it. Even if it is a handful of grass, it is usury."
Malik said, "The generally agreed on way of doing things among us
is that there is no harm in borrowing any animals with a set
description and itemisation, and one must return the like of them.
This is not done in the case of female slaves. It is feared about that
that it will lead to making halal what is not halal, so it is not
good. The explanation of what is disapproved of in that, is that a man
borrow a slave-girl and have intercourse with her as seems proper to
him. Then he returns her to her owner. That is not good and it is not
halal. The people of knowledge still forbid it and do not give an
indulgence to any one in it."
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 31, Hadith 95
Hadith 513810
Chapter 31: Business Transactions - كتاب البيوع
حَدَّثَنِي يَحْيَى، عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ
" لاَ يَبِعْ بَعْضُكُمْ عَلَى بَيْعِ بَعْضٍ " .
Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi from Abdullah ibn Umar
that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace,
said, "Do not let any of you bid against each other."
Malik related to me from Abu'z-Zinad from al-Araj from Abu
Hurayra that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, said, "Do not go out to meet the caravans for trade, do not bid
against each other, outbidding in order to raise the price, and a
townsman must not buy on behalf of a man of the desert, and do not tie
up the udders of camels and sheep so that they appear to have a lot of
milk, for a person who buys them after that has two recourses open to
him after he milks them. If he is pleased with them, he keeps them and
if he is displeased with them, he can return them along with a sa of
dates."
Malik said, "The explanation of the words of the
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, according
to what we think - and Allah knows best - 'do not bid against each
other,' is that it is forbidden for a man to offer a price over the
price of his brother when the seller has inclined to the bargainer and
made conditions about the weight of the gold and he has declared
himself not liable for faults and such things by which it is
recognised that the seller wants to make a transaction with the
bargainer. This is what he forbade, and Allah knows best."
Malik said, "There is no harm, however, in more than one person
bidding against each other over goods put up for sale."
He
said, "Were people to leave off haggling when the first person started
haggling, an unreal price might be taken and the disapproved would
enter into the sale of the goods. This is still the way of doing
things among us."
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 31, Hadith 97
Hadith 513830
Chapter 31: Business Transactions - كتاب البيوع
قَالَ مَالِكٌ عَنْ نَافِعٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم نَهَى عَنِ النَّجْشِ .
Malik said, from Nafi from Abdullah ibn Umar that the Messenger
of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, forbade najsh.
Malik said, "Najsh is to offer a man more than the worth of his
goods when you do not mean to buy them and someone else follows you in
bidding."
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 31, Hadith 98
Hadith 513840
Chapter 31: Business Transactions - كتاب البيوع
حَدَّثَنِي يَحْيَى، عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ دِينَارٍ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ، أَنَّ رَجُلاً، ذَكَرَ لِرَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم أَنَّهُ يُخْدَعُ فِي الْبُيُوعِ فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم
" إِذَا بَايَعْتَ فَقُلْ لاَ خِلاَبَةَ " . قَالَ فَكَانَ الرَّجُلُ إِذَا بَايَعَ يَقُولُ لاَ خِلاَبَةَ .
Yahya related to me from Malik from Abdullah ibn Dinar from
Abdullah ibn Umar that a man mentioned to the Messenger of Allah, may
Allah bless him and grant him peace, that he was always being cheated
in business transactions. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him
and grant him peace, said, "When you enter a transaction, say, 'No
trickery.' So whenever that man entered a transaction, he would say,
'No trickery.' "
Malik related to me that Yahya ibn Said heard Said ibn al-
Musayyab say, "When you come to a land where they give full measure
and full weight, stay there. When you come to a land where they
shorten the measure and weight, then do not stay there very long."
Malik related to me from Yahya ibn Said that he heard Muhammad
ibn al-Munkadir say, "Allah loves his slave who is generous when he
sells, and generous when he buys, generous when he repays, and
generous when he is repaid."
Malik said about a man who
bought camels or sheep or dry goods or slaves or any goods without
measuring precisely, "There is no buying without measuring precisely
in anything which can be counted . "
Malik said about a man
who gave a man goods to sell for him and set their price saying, "If
you sell them for this price as I have ordered you to do, you will
have a dinar (or something which he has specified, which they are both
satisfied with), if you do not sell them, you will have nothing,"
"There is no harm in that when he names a price to sell them at and
names a known fee. If he sells the goods, he takes the fee, and if he
does not sell them, he has nothing."
Malik said, "This is
like saying to another man, 'If you capture my runaway slave or bring
my stray camel, you will have such-and-such.' This is from the
category of reward, and not from the category of giving a wage. Had it
been from the category of giving a wage, it would not be good."
Malik said, "As for a man who is given goods and told that if he
sells them he will have a named percentage for every dinar, that is
not good because whenever he is a dinar less than the price of the
goods, he decreases the due which was named for him. This is an
uncertain transaction. He does not know how much he will be given."
Malik related to me that he asked Ibn Shihab about a man who
hired an animal, and then re-hired it out for more than what he hired
it for. He said, "There is no harm in that."
Malik related to me from Zayd ibn Aslam that his father said,
"Abdullah and Ubaydullah, the sons of Umar ibn al-Khattab went out
with the army to Iraq. On the way home, they passed by Abu Musa al-
Ashari who was the amir of Basra. He greeted them and made them
welcome, and told them that if there was anything he could do to help
them, he would do it. Then he said, 'There is some of the property of
Allah which I want to send to the amir al-muminin, so I will lend it
to you, and you can buy wares from Iraq and sell them in Madina. Then
give the principal to the amir al-muminin, and you keep the profit.'
They said that they would like to do it, and so he gave them the money
and wrote to Umar ibn al-Khattab to take the money from them. When
they came to sell they made a profit, and when they paid the principal
to Umar he asked, 'Did he lend everyone in the army the like of what
he lent you?' They said, 'No.' Umar ibn al-Khattab said, 'He made you
the loan, because you are the sons of the amir al-muminin, so pay the
principal and the profit.' Abdullah was silent. Ubaydullah said, 'You
do not need to do this, amir al-muminin. Had the principal decreased
or been destroyed, we would have guaranteed it.' Umar said, 'Pay it.'
Abdullah was silent, and Ubaydullah repeated it. A man who was sitting
with Umar said, 'Amir al-muminin, better that you make it a qirad.
'Umar said, 'I have made it qirad.' Umar then took the principal and
half of the profit, and Abdullah and Ubaydullah, the sons of Umar ibn
al-Khattab took half of the profit."
Malik related to me from al-Ala ibn Abd ar-Rahman from his father
from his father that Uthman ibn Affan gave him some money as qirad to
use provided the profit was shared between them.
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 32, Hadith 2
Hadith 513900
Chapter 33: Sharecropping - كتاب المساقاة
حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى، عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْمُسَيَّبِ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ لِيَهُودِ خَيْبَرَ يَوْمَ افْتَتَحَ خَيْبَرَ
" أُقِرُّكُمْ فِيهَا مَا أَقَرَّكُمُ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ عَلَى أَنَّ الثَّمَرَ بَيْنَنَا وَبَيْنَكُمْ " . قَالَ فَكَانَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَبْعَثُ عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ رَوَاحَةَ فَيَخْرُصُ بَيْنَهُ وَبَيْنَهُمْ ثُمَّ يَقُولُ إِنْ شِئْتُمْ فَلَكُمْ وَإِنْ شِئْتُمْ فَلِيَ . فَكَانُوا يَأْخُذُونَهُ .
Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from Said ibn al-
Musayyab that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant
him peace, said to the jews of Khaybar on the day of the conquest of
Khaybar, "I confirm you in it as long as Allah, the Mighty, the
Majestic, establishes you in it, provided that the fruits are divided
between us and you." Said continued, "The Messenger of Allah, may
Allah bless him and grant him peace, used to send Abdullah ibn Rawaha,
to assess the division of the fruit crop between him and them, and he
would say, 'If you wish, you can buy it back, and if you wish, it is
mine.' They would take it."
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 33, Hadith 1
Hadith 513910
Chapter 33: Sharecropping - كتاب المساقاة
Malik related to me from Ibn Shihab from Sulayman ibn Yasar that
the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, used
to send Abdullah ibn Rawaha to Khaybar, to assess the division of the
fruit crop between him and the jews of Khaybar.
The jews
collected for Abdullah pieces of their women's jewellery and said to
him, "This is yours. Go light on us and don't be exact in the
division!"
Abdullah ibn Rawaha said, "O tribe of jews! By
Allah! You are among the most hateful to me of Allah's creation, but
it does not prompt me to deal unjustly with you. What you have offered
as a bribe is forbidden. We will not touch it." They said, "This is
what supports the heavens and the earth."
Malik said, "If a
share-cropper waters the palms and between them there is some
uncultivated land, whatever he cultivates in the uncultivated land is
his."
Malik said, "If the owner of the land makes a condition
that he will cultivate the uncultivated land for himself, that is not
good because the sharecropper does the watering for the owner of the
land and so he increases the owner of the land in property (without
any return for himself)."
Malik said, "If the owner
stipulates that the fruit crop is to be shared between them, there is
no harm in that if all the maintenance of the property - seeding,
watering and case, etc. - are the concern of the sharecropper.
If the share-cropper stipulates that the seeds are the
responsibility of the owner of the property - that is not permitted
because he has stipulated an outlay against the owner of the property.
Share-cropping is conducted on the basis that all the care and expense
is outlayed by the share-cropper, and the owner of the property is not
obliged anything. This is the accepted method of share-cropping."
Malik spoke about a spring which was shared between two men, and
then the water dried up and one of them wanted to work on the spring
and the other said, "I don't have the means to work on it." He said,
"Tell the one who wants to work on the spring, 'Work and expend. All
the water will be yours. You will have its water until your companion
brings you half of what you have spent. If he brings you half of what
you have spent, he can take his share of the water.' The first one is
given all the water, because he has spent on it, and if he does not
reach anything by his work, the other has not incurred any expense."
Malik said, "It is not good for a share-cropper not to expend
anything but his labour and to be hired for a share of the fruit while
all the expense and work is incurred by the owner of the garden,
because the share-cropper does not know what the exact wage is going
to be for his labour, whether it will be little or great."
Malik said, "No-one who lends a qirad or grants a share-cropping
contract, should exempt some of the wealth, or some of the trees from
his agent, because, by that, the agent becomes his hired man. He says,
'I will grant you a share-crop provided that you work for me on such-
and-such a palm - water it and tend it. I will give you a qirad for
such-and-such money provided that you work for me with ten dinars.
They are not part of the qirad I have given you.' That must not be
done and it is not good. This is what is done in our community."
Malik said, "The sunna about what is permitted to an owner of a
garden in share-cropping is that he can stipulate to the share-cropper
the maintenance of walls, cleaning the spring, sweeping the irrigation
canals, pollinating the palms, pruning branches, harvesting the fruit
and such things, provided that the share-cropper has a share of the
fruit fixed by mutual agreement. However, the owner cannot stipulate
the beginning of new work which the agent will start digging a well,
raising the source of a well, instigating new planting, or building a
cistern whose cost is great. That is as if the owner of the garden
said to a certain man, 'Build me a house here or dig me a well or make
a spring flow for me or do some work for me for half the fruit of this
garden of mine,' before the fruit of the garden is sound and it is
halal to sell it. This is the sale of fruit before its good condition
is clear. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, forbade fruit to be sold before its good condition became
clear."
Malik said, "If the fruits are good and their good
condition is clear and selling them is halal and then the owner asks a
man to do one of those jobs for him, specifying the job, for half the
fruit of his garden, for example, there is no harm in that. He has
hired the man for something recognised and known. The man has seen it
and is satisfied with it.
"As for share-cropping, if the
garden has no fruit or little or bad fruit, he has only that. The
labourer is only hired for a set amount, and hire is only permitted on
these terms. Hire is a type of sale. One man buys another man's work
from him. It is not good if uncertainty enters into it because the
Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, forbade
uncertain transactions."
Malik said, "The sunna in share-
cropping with us is that it can be practised with any kind of fruit
tree, palm, vine, olive tree, pomegranate, peach, and soon. It is
permitted, and there is no harm in it provided that the owner of the
property has a share of the fruit:
a half or a third or a quarter or
whatever."
Malik said, "Share-cropping is also permitted in
any crop which emerges from the earth if it is a crop which is picked,
and its owner cannot water, work on it and tend it.
"Share-
cropping becomes reprehensible in anything in which share-cropping is
normally permitted if the fruit is sound and the good condition is
clear and it is halal to sell it. He must share-crop in it the next
year. If a man waters fruit whose good condition is clear and it is
halal to sell it, and he picks it for the owner, for a share of the
crop, it is not sharecropping. It is similar to him being paid in
dirhams and dinars. Share-cropping is what is between pruning the
palms and when the fruit becomes sound and its sale is halal."
Malik said, "If some one makes a share-cropping contract for fruit
trees before the condition becomes clear and its sale is halal, it is
share-cropping and is permitted . "
Malik said, "Uncultivated
land must not be involved in a share-cropping contract. That is
because it is halal for the owner to rent it for dinars and dirhams or
the equivalent for an accepted price."
Malik said, "As for a
man who gives his uncultivated earth for a third or a fourth of what
comes out of it, that is an uncertain transaction because crops may be
scant one time and plentiful another time. It may perish completely
and the owner of the land will have abandoned a set rent which would
have been good for him to rent the land for. He takes an uncertain
situation, and does not know whether or not it will be satisfactory.
This is disapproved. It is like a man having someone travel for him
for a set amount, and then saying, 'Shall I give you a tenth of the
profit of the journey as your wage?' This is not halal and must not be
done."
Malik summed up,"A man must not hire out himself or
his land or his ship unless for a set amount."
Malik said, "A
distinction is made between sharecropping in palms and in cultivated
land because the owner of the palms cannot sell the fruit until its
good condition is clear. The owner of the land can rent it when it is
uncultivated with nothing on it."
Malik said, "What is done
in our community about palms is that they can also be share-cropped
for three and four years, and less or more than that."
Malik
said, "That is what I have heard. Any fruit trees like that are in the
position of palms. Contracts for several years are permissible for the
sharecropper as they are permissible in the palms."
Malik
said about the owner, "He does not take anything additional from the
share-cropper in the way of gold or silver or crops which increases
him. That is not good. The share-cropper also must not take from the
owner of the garden anything additional which will increase him of
gold, silver, crops or anything. Increase beyond what is stipulated in
the contract is not good. It is also not good for the lender of a
qirad to be in this position. If such an increase does enter share-
cropping or quirad, it becomes by it hire. It is not good when hire
enters it. Hire must never occur in a situation which has uncertainty
in it."
Malik spoke about a man who gave land to another man
in a share-cropping contract in which there were palms, vines, or the
like of that of fruit trees and there was also uncultivated land in
it. He said, "If the uncultivated land is secondary to the fruit
trees, either in importance or in size of land, there is no harm in
share-cropping. That is if the palms take up two-thirds of the land or
more, and the uncultivated land is a third or less. This is because
when the land that the fruit trees take up is secondary to the
uncultivated land and the cultivated land in which the palms, vines or
the like is a third or less, and the uncultivated land is two-thirds
or more, it is permitted to rent the land and share-cropping in it is
haram."
"One of the practices of people is to give out
sharecropping contracts on property with fruit trees when there is
uncultivated land in it, and to rent land while there are fruit trees
on it, just as a Qur'an or sword which has some embellishment on it of
silver is sold for silver, or a necklace or ring which have stones and
gold in them are sold for dinars. These sales continue to be
permitted. People buy and sell by them. Nothing described or
instituted has come on that which if exceeded, makes it haram, and if
fallen below makes it halal. What is done in our community about that
is what people practise and permit among themselves. That is, if the
gold or silver is secondary to what it is incorporated in, it is
permitted to sell it. That is, if the value of the blade, the Qur'an,
or the stones is two-thirds or more, and the value of the decoration
is one-third or less."
Yahya said that Malik said, "The best of what has been heard
about a sharecropper stipulating on the owner of the property the
inclusion of some slave workers, is that there is no harm in that if
they are workers that come with the property. They are like the
property. There is no profit in them for the share-cropper except to
lighten some of his burden. If they did not come with the property,
his toil would be harder. It is like share-cropping land with a spring
or land with a watering trough. You will not find anyone who receives
the same share for share-cropping two lands which are equal in
property and yield, when one property has a constant plentiful spring
and the other has a watering trough, because of the lightness of
working land with a spring, and the hardship of working land with a
watering trough."
Malik added, "That is what is done in our
community."
Malik said, "A share-cropper cannot employ
workers from the property in other work, and he cannot make that a
stipulation with the one who gives him the share-cropping contract.
Nor is it permitted to one who share-crops to stipulate on the owner
of the property inclusion of slaves for use in the garden who are not
in it when he makes the share-cropping contract."
"Nor must
the owner of the property stipulate on the one who uses his property
for share-cropping that he take any of the slaves of the property and
remove him from the property. The share-cropping of property is based
on the state which it is currently in."
"If the owner of the
property wants to remove one of the slaves of the property, he removes
him before the share-cropping, or if he wants to put someone into the
property, he does it before the share-cropping. Then he grants the
share-cropping contract after that if he wishes. If any of the slaves
die or go off or become ill, the owner of the property must replace
them."
Yahya related to me from Malik from Rabia ibn Abd ar-Rahman from
Handhala ibn Qays az-Zuraqi from Rafi ibn Khadij that the Messenger of
Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, forbade renting out
fields.
Handhala said, "I asked Rafi ibn Khadij, about paying
in gold and silver, and he said, 'There is no harm in it.' "
Malik related to me that Ibn Shihab said, "I asked Said ibn al-
Musayyab about renting land for gold or silver, and he said, 'There is
no harm in it.' "
Malik related to me from Ibn Shihab that he asked Salim ibn
'Abdullah ibn Umar about renting out fields. He said, "There is no
harm in it for gold or silver." Ibn Shihab said, "I said to him, 'What
do you think of the hadith which is mentioned from Rafi ibn Khadij?'"
He said, ''Rafi has exaggerated. If I had a field, I would rent it
out."
Malik related to me that he had heard that Abd ar-Rahman ibn Awf
rented land, and he continued to have it in his possession until he
died. His son said, "I thought that it was ours because of the length
of time which it had remained in his hands, until he mentioned it to
us at his death. He ordered us to pay some rent which he owed in gold
or silver."
Malik related to me from Hisham ibn Urwa that his father used to
rent out his land for gold and silver.
Malik was asked about
a man who rented his field for 100 sa of dates or part of its produce
of wheat or from other than its produce. He disapproved of that.
Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab from Said ibn al- Musayyab and from Abu Salama ibn Abd ar-Rahman ibn Awf that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, decreed for partners the right of preemption in property which had not been divided up. When boundaries had been fixed between them, then there was no right of pre-emption.
Malik said that he heard that Said ibn al-Musayyab, when asked
about pre-emption and whether there was a sunna in it, said, "Yes.
Pre-emption is in houses and land, and it is only between partners."
Malik related to me that he heard the like of that from Sulayman
ibn Yasar.
Malik spoke about a man who bought out one of the
partners in a shared property, by paying the man with an animal, a
slave, a slave-girl, or the equivalent of that in goods. Then another
partner decided to exercise his right of pre-emption after that, and
he found that the slave or slave-girl had died, and no one knew what
her value had been. The buyer claimed, "The value of the slave or
slave-girl was 100 dinars." The partner with the right of pre-emption
claimed, "The value was 50 dinars."
Malik said, "The buyer
takes an oath that the value of what he payed was 100 dinars. Then if
the one with the right of pre-emption wishes, he can compensate him,
or else he can leave it, unless he can bring a clear proof that the
slave or slave-girl's value is less than what the buyer said. If
someone gives away his portion of a shared house or land and the
recipient repays him for it by cash or goods, the partners can take it
by pre-emption if they wish and pay off the recipient the value of
what he gave in dinars or dirhams. If someone makes a gift of his
portion of a shared house or land, and does not take any remuneration
and does not seek to, and a partner wants to take it for its value, he
cannot do so as long as the original partner has not been given
recompense for it. If there is any recompense, the one with the right
of pre-emption can have it for the price of the recompense."
Malik spoke about a man who bought into a piece of shared land for a
price on credit, and one of the partners wanted to possess it by right
of pre-emption . Malik said, "If it seems likely that the partner can
meet the terms, he has right of pre-emption for the same credit terms.
If it is feared that he will not be able to meet the terms, but he can
bring a wealthy and reliable guarantor of equal standing to the one
who bought into the land, he can also take possession."
Malik
said, "A person's absence does not sever his right of pre-emption.
Even if he is a way for a long time, there is no time limit after
which the right of preemption is cut off."
Malik said that if
a man left land to a number of his children, then one of them who had
a child died and the child of the deceased sold his right in that
land, the brother of the seller was more entitled to pre-empt him than
his paternal uncles, the partners of his father.
Malik said,
"This is what is done in our community."
Malik said, "Pre-
emption is shared between partners according to their existing shares.
Each of them takes according to his portion. If it is small, he has
little. If it is great, it is according to that. That is if they are
tenacious and contend with each other about it."
Malik said,
"As for a man who buys out the share of one of his partners, and one
of the other partners says, 'I will take a portion according to my
share,' and the first partner says, 'If you wish to take all the
preemption, I will give it up to you. If you wish to leave it, then
leave it.' If the first partner gives him the choice and hands it over
to him, the second partner can only take all the pre-emption or give
it back. If he takes it, he is entitled to it. If not, he has
nothing."
Malik spoke about a man who bought land, and
developed it by planting trees or digging a well etc., and then
someone came, and seeing that he had a right in the land, wanted to
take possession of it by pre-emption. Malik said "He has no right of
preemption unless he compensates the other for his expenditure. If he
gives him the price of what he has developed, he is entitled to pre-
emption . If not, he has no right in it."
Malik said that
someone who sold off his portion of a shared house or land and then,
on learning that some one with a right of pre-emption was to take
possession by that right, asked the buyer to revoke the sale, and he
did so, did not have the right to do that. The pre-emptor has more
right to the property for the price for which he sold it.
In
the case of some one who bought along with a section of a shared house
or land, an animal and goods (that were not shared), so that when any
one demanded his right of pre-emption in the house or land he said,
"Take what I have bought altogether, for I bought it altogether,"
Malik said, "The pre-emptor need only take possession of the house or
land. Each thing the man bought is assessed according to its share of
the lump sum the man paid. Then the pre-emptor takes possession of his
right for a price which is appropriate on that basis. He does not take
any animals or goods unless he wants to do that."
Malik said,
"If someone sells a section of shared land, and one of those who have
the right of preemption surrenders it to the buyer and another refuses
to do other than take his pre-emption, the one who refuses to
surrender has to take all the preemption, and he cannot take according
to his right and leave what remains.
In the case where one of
a number of partners in one house sold his share when all his partners
were away except for one man, the one present was given the choice of
either taking the pre-emption or leaving it, and he said, 'I will take
my portion and leave the portions of my partners until they are
present. If they take it, that is that. If they leave it, I will take
all the pre-emption,' Malik said, 'He can only take it all or leave
it. If his partners come, they can take from him or leave it as they
wish. If this is offered to him and he does not accept, I think that
he has no pre-emption.' "
Yahya said that Malik related from Muhammad ibn Umara from Abu
Bakr ibn Hazm that Uthman ibn Affan said, "When boundaries are fixed
in land, there is no pre-emption in it. There is no pre-emption in a
well or in male palm trees. "
Malik said, "This is what is
done in our community."
Malik said, "There is no pre-emption
in a road, whether or not it is practical to divide it."
Malik said, "What is done in our community is that there is no pre-
emption in the courtyard of a house, whether or not it is practical to
divide it."
Malik spoke about a man who bought into a shared
property provided that he had the option of withdrawal and the
partners of the seller wanted to take what their partner was selling
by pre-emption before the buyer had exercised his option. Malik said,
"They cannot do that until the buyer has taken possession and the sale
is confirmed for him. When the sale is confirmed, they have the right
of pre-emption."
Malik spoke about a man who bought land and
it remained in his hands for some time. Then a man came and saw that
he had a share of the land by inheritance. Malik said, "If the man's
right of inheritance is established, he also has a right of
preemption. If the land has produced a crop, the crop belongs to the
buyer until the day when the right of the other is established,
because he has tended what was planted against being destroyed or
being carried away by a flood."
Malik continued, "If the time
has been long, or the witnesses are dead or the seller has died, or
the buyer has died, or they are both alive and the basis of the sale
and purchase has been forgotten because of the length of time, pre-
emption is discontinued. A man only takes his right by inheritance
which has been established for him. If his situation differs from
this, because the sale transaction is recent and he sees that the
seller has concealed the price in order to sever his right of pre-
emption, the value of the land is estimated, and he buys the land for
that price by his right of pre-emption. Then the buildings, plants, or
structures which are extra to the land are looked at, so he is in the
position of some one who bought the land for a known price, and then
after that built on it and planted. The owner of pre-emption takes
possession after that is included."
Malik said, "Pre-emption
is applied to the property of the deceased as it is applied to the
property of the living. If the family of the deceased fear to break up
the property of the deceased, then they share it and sell it, and they
have no pre-emption in it."
Malik said, "There is no pre-
emption among us in a slave or a slave-girl or a camel, a cow, sheep,
or any animal, nor in clothes or a well which does not have any
uncultivated land around it. Pre-emption is in what can be usefully
divided, and in land in which boundaries occur. As for what cannot be
usefully divided, there is no pre-emption in it."
Malik said,
"Some one who buys land in which people who are present have a right
of pre-emption, refers them to the Sultan and either they claim their
right or the Sultan surrenders it to him. If he were to leave them,
and not refer their situation to the Sultan and they knew about his
purchase, and then they left it until a long time had passed and then
came demanding their pre-emption, I do not think that they would have
it."
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 35, Hadith 4
Hadith 514010
Chapter 36: Judgements - كتاب الأقضية
حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى، عَنْ مَالِكٍ، عَنْ هِشَامِ بْنِ عُرْوَةَ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ زَيْنَبَ بِنْتِ أَبِي سَلَمَةَ، عَنْ أُمِّ سَلَمَةَ، زَوْجِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ
" إِنَّمَا أَنَا بَشَرٌ وَإِنَّكُمْ تَخْتَصِمُونَ إِلَىَّ فَلَعَلَّ بَعْضَكُمْ أَنْ يَكُونَ أَلْحَنَ بِحُجَّتِهِ مِنْ بَعْضٍ فَأَقْضِيَ لَهُ عَلَى نَحْوِ مَا أَسْمَعُ مِنْهُ فَمَنْ قَضَيْتُ لَهُ بِشَىْءٍ مِنْ حَقِّ أَخِيهِ فَلاَ يَأْخُذَنَّ مِنْهُ شَيْئًا فَإِنَّمَا أَقْطَعُ لَهُ قِطْعَةً مِنَ النَّارِ " .
Yahya related to me from Malik from Hisham ibn Urwa from his
father from Zaynab bint Abi Salama from Umm Salama, the wife of the
Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, that the Messenger
of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, "I am but a
man to whom you bring your disputes. Perhaps one of you is more
eloquent in his proof than the other, so I give judgement according to
what I have heard from him. Whatever I decide for him which is part of
the right of his brother, he must not take any of it, for I am
granting him a portion of the Fire."
Malik related to me from Yahya ibn Said from Said ibn al-Musayyab
that Umar ibn al-Khattab had a dispute brought to him between a muslim
and a jew. Umar saw that the right belonged to the jew and decided in
his favour. The jew said to him, "By Allah! You have judged
correctly.'' So Umar ibn al-Khattab struck him with a whip and said,
"How can you be sure." The jew said to him, "We find that there is no
judge who judges correctly but that there is an angel on his right
side and an angel on his left side who guide him and give him success
in the truth as long as he is with the truth. When he leaves the
truth, they rise and leave him."